Ethnic Cleansing of Serbs From Sarajevo
Only Buildings Left
The beginning of war in Sarajevo on 6 April 1992. was the beginning of the persecution and ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Sarajevo, the largest ethnic cleansing in Europe since World War II, prominent Serb politicians and intellectuals agree.
Until that date lived in Sarajevo over 160,000 Serbs and another 20,000 Serbs who considered themselves the Yugoslavs. Today there is no 8000, the old and sick who have no other choice but to live as citizens of the third category.
But although the official and unofficial Sarajevo want to show that the war began April 6, 1992, the day when they openly began to attack the Serbs in Sarajevo and the Serbs to defend themselves it is not so.
The persecution and murder of Serbs have begun much earlier. Between else one of proof of this is the current Law on Rights of Veterans of Bosniak Federation that beginning of years of war service to members of the Patriotic League and the ”Green Berets” admits the first March 1991.year, which means a whole year before the war. Serbs have nothing to do with causing the start of the war. They tried in every way to avoid it, but they had no chance.
Dayton Agreement Great Success
Dayton Agreement
Next Kosovo and Metohija?
On the occasion of the anniversary of Dayton agreement, Serb Republic President, Milorad Dodik stated that: “There is no doubt that the Dayton agreement is one of the most successful political agreement in recent history. Today is 16 years since the Dayton agreement, and the Serb Republic is successful in defending its values and will defend their autonomy and seek a return of all values of the original Dayton agreement.”
Unfortunately , by the interventions of some High Representatives, who abused the institution of the High Representative and misled the international community several times, the original Dayton Agreement is violated. I still think that the institutions of the High Representative can be helpful, especially in restoring the original Dayton Agreement. The fact that the EU is actively involved in the political life of the Balkan countries, including the f Serb Republic only confirms that the original Daytona agreement was sufficient for all the changes required for EU integration. Therefore, the Serb Republic representatives should, in close cooperation with the High Representative and EU special representative, work in returning the original Dayton Agreement and the legislative changes in accordance with it, which are required for EU integration.
For all that the people of Serb Republic has every reason to celebratetoday’s anniversary of the signing of the Daytona Agreement and to be grateful to those who have it made possible and specially to our Russian, American, German, French and British friends and specially our dear friend Richard Holbroock.
I can only hope that we and they will be able to find similar will to make similar agreement regarding Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija.
Moral Corruption as a Permanent Bosniak Feature
Mental Corruption
There are various way in which the moral corruption was embedded in the thinking and behavior of so called Bosniak people and their culture or better to say lack of culture. To understand it, we should poked at the whole scenario from sociological perspective and Durkheimian postulation that all behavior are socially and historically determined. I would say that in this case historical factors were prevalent. At the moment when big chunk of our society had accepted Islam as its ideology and only for opportunistic and selfish reasons, and I repeat only for selfish and opportunistic reasons and nothing else was decisive. If we define moral corruption as any form of reciprocal behavior or transaction where both the power holder and oppressed / in this case majority who did not accepted changes for opportunistic reasons/ can respectively initiated the inducement of each other by some rewards to grant, preferential treatment or favor, morally, and sometimes even socially unacceptable. To make it worse Bosniak moral corruption were going in two direction. First and foremost to the Ottoman occupiers which they tried to corrupt to obtain greater and usually not granted privileges even for other Muslim subject and other direction was toward other Serbs who didn’t accepted changes and conversion. Most of the time, during 500 years of Ottoman occupation system worked well for them, and they obtained what they wanted, mostly at expenses of their compatriots, and often members of the same family who didn’t accept conversion to Islam, in Bosniak case not Islam like religion but way to facilitate corruption.
The “nation” such this “bosniak” should have responsibility to educate, socialize, and mobilize, enlighten and sensitize its citizens towards a tradition of honesty, excellence, truth, diligence, integrity, honor, reputation, good name and other moral virtues that will led to establishment of new moral Order. Unfortunatelly as mentioned before system quite contrary of this one worked so well for them and for so long time that is already embedded in their essence, and they try to improve it.
Problem like this deserve serious attention and collective solution.
European Union “Structured Dialogue” on Bosnia Judiciary
Ashton-Markel
Serb Republic Opinions Presented
Serb Republic delegation presented at a technical meeting of the structured dialogue the official view on issues of Serb Republic Court, the Constitutional Court and the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council, said Advisor to the Minister of Justice of Serb Republic, Nikola Kovacevic.
According to him, the focus is on the issue of how to appeal the decision of the Trial Court, the retroactive application of the Criminal Code of BiH in judicial decision making, selection of judges and prosecutors in VSTS and the legal regulation of the election of judges and prosecutors in the Serb Republic.
Kovacevic said that the Serb Republic representatives at the next meeting is likely to propose a way of resolving complaints at first instance verdict of BiH Court.Conveying the views of Serb Republic, Kovacevic said that BiH Court should not retroactively apply the Criminal Code, but the code of EX Yugoslavia as lenient, and that VSTS can not survive in this composition because in the selection of judges and prosecutors participate lawyers and prosecutors themselves, which is not good.
As a particularly important issue that is still open, Kovacevic mentioned the problem of choosing judges and prosecutors in the Serb Republic. Serbian Republic is committed that a body which will elect judges to be governed by the law of the Serb Republic, for which there is a constitutional basis in the Constitution of the Serb Republic and the conclusions of the National Assembly.
However my personal opinion is that changes in the judiciary should be more thorough. Representation and control to the federal judiciary should be more detailed.
In particular, it would be important to develop a strategy for action. It is obvious that the Muslim Bosniak political elite is making problems, and obstruction from the start. Obviously they do not want any changes.
Action should be carefully coordinated with our American, Russian and European friends and could be in the form of taking control of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the judicial and executive police entities.
Home 